<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrej Koelewijn - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-fbad0a49" type="application/json"/><link>http://akoblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://akoblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:57:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Using google talk from java example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2008/12/30/using-google-talk-from-java-example/#comment-528608573</link><description>&lt;p&gt;java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/media/Format&lt;br&gt;Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javax.media.Format&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)&lt;br&gt;	at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)&lt;br&gt;	at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)&lt;br&gt;	at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)&lt;br&gt;	at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)&lt;br&gt;Exception in thread "main" &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wowankit23</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 12:57:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Absent Code attribute in method that is not native or abstract</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2010/03/04/absent-code-attribute-in-method-that-is-not-native-or-abstract/#comment-523307240</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can include the 67 mb embedded glassfish jar.  Feels kinda sucky, but it's a quick workaround.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;dependency&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;groupid&amp;gt;org.glassfish.main.extras&amp;lt;/groupid&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;artifactid&amp;gt;glassfish-embedded-all&amp;lt;/artifactid&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;version&amp;gt;3.1.2&amp;lt;/version&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;scope&amp;gt;provided&amp;lt;/scope&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/dependency&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Travis Stevens</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting started with Nexus maven repository manager</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2010/03/09/getting-started-with-nexus-maven-repository-manager/#comment-517324835</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Your examples are littered with Unicode no-break spaces which aren't parsed properly with Maven when you copy+paste the example into ~/.m2/settings.xml.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;U+00A0 c2 a0 NO-BREAK SPACE&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Neil Hooey</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:19:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Synchronous endpoint in MULE</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2009/03/30/synchronous-endpoint-in-mule/#comment-502602877</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is from 2009. Its old content&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jorge</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:32:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using css webfonts in inkscape</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/01/17/using-css-webfonts-in-inkscape/#comment-474385780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is an excellent idea but I can't seem to get it to work in Inkscape. My file loads ok in a browser but my file (and yours for that matter) don't seem to load in inkscape. I even tried stripping out your script bits in case that was the issue... no joy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 07:45:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fixing missing Mule osgi dependencies when using maven</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2009/08/21/fixing-missing-mule-osgi-dependencies-when-using-maven/#comment-466355067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;did it work ? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sana</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:35:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Implementing dependent select boxes in JSF</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2006/04/04/implementing-dependent-select-boxes-in-jsf/#comment-459518854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;waste&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fvdg</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 00:24:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle XE on Ubuntu using Vagrant and Puppet</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/02/28/oracle-xe-on-ubuntu-using-vagrant-and-puppet/#comment-453872461</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many thanks for this! Simplest way to install Oracle ever :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Houston</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Oracle XE on Ubuntu using Vagrant and Puppet</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/02/28/oracle-xe-on-ubuntu-using-vagrant-and-puppet/#comment-452660385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great work! Thanks for the great info.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nicole_gamble</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:59:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using google talk from java example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2008/12/30/using-google-talk-from-java-example/#comment-440819776</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is anyone here who was able to solve the problem of connection timed out..&lt;br&gt;I am facing the same and have tried a lot to remove it.&lt;br&gt;Please help&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Self-service architecture to avoid water-scrum-fall</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/02/08/noops-selfservic/#comment-438117296</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You have to be careful that you don't optimize your initial innovation speed at the expense of too much of your long-term innovation speed. I've seen far too many projects come out of the gate really fast, declare victory and then slam into a wall. Some overhead and coordination is necessary overhead and coordination, particularly if your horizon is longer than the next few months of development. A great whack of code is nothing more than a big pile of spaghetti if you haven't organized it in some way. Disorganization only gets worse, not better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul W. Homer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Self-service architecture to avoid water-scrum-fall</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/02/08/noops-selfservic/#comment-437947576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, nothing is perfect. By having loosely coupled teams you will loose a bit of efficiency regarding coding. But you gain that efficiency by cutting away overhead and coordination. In my view, what you win is bigger than what you loose.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think it is a very big win if every team understand their customer, and can prioritize on what the customer/user needs. You will gain a lot of innovation speed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you find functionality that is really useful for multiple teams, spin it off into a separate component, with a separate team.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:44:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Self-service architecture to avoid water-scrum-fall</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2012/02/08/noops-selfservic/#comment-437752864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. One problem I've found with a lot of small teams is that depending on the architecture, teams often have to re-write the same basic code for themselves. That can be a significant amount of extra work (and the source of many integration bugs). The alternative, to have layers -- such as a 'core' team, a 'communications' team, etc. -- but this causes it's own issues with dependencies, scheduling and the rather high impact of deep changes (bugs tend to get frozen into the code). Either way, the architecture of the system mirrors the arrangement of the teams. And generally in the past, in areas of the system/development that have not been explicitly organized and structured, chaos has caused spaghetti, lots of bugs, excess testing requirements and a whole load of extra complexity (and sometimes the death of the project). Starting small and growing into the project has been the most effective approach I've seen, but these days people are far too impatient to wait for the project to scale up properly. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Paul. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul W. Homer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:26:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-430663681</link><description>&lt;p&gt; I agree that most of the visual stuff that we used to do with javascript will be done using css3 and html5. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But i think that most of the user interface code, the controller part of MVC, and also the model part will be coded in javascript in the browser, instead of on the server. So expect the amount of javascript to actually increase instead of decrease, just for a different purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 03:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-425371444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as "web-based" software architecture, I think CSS3 and HTML5 are actually MORE significant than everything else combined.  I believe web pages in the near future will consist of little to no script at all.  Anything CSS3 has implemented that substitutes what only a script could do prior implements the effect as good, if not better (tooltips, transitions, etc.)  Who knows; maybe even MS Windows will one day be virus free thanks to CSS3 and HTML5 (but I wouldn't bet on it).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pcdiggs</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:34:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is Agile?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/11/what-is-agile/#comment-396864068</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I recommend the definition on page &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Best_practice_Agile.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/B...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gebhard Greiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:16:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is Agile?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/11/what-is-agile/#comment-396850897</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For defining Agile we should focus on &lt;strong&gt;the goal of&lt;br&gt;Agile&lt;/strong&gt; rather than on the misleading, very problematic way&lt;br&gt;suggested by the authors of the Agile Manifesto. Please read &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/The_New_(2011)_Definition_of_Agile.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;New (2011) Definitions of Agile&lt;/a&gt; or&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Agile_is_not_Manifesto.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;Manifesto can be Poison&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For defining Agile we should focus on &lt;strong&gt;the goal of&lt;br&gt;Agile&lt;/strong&gt; rather than on the misleading, very problematic way&lt;br&gt;suggested by the authors of the Agile Manifesto. Please read &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/The_New_(2011)_Definition_of_Agile.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;New (2011) Definitions of Agile&lt;/a&gt; or&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Agile_is_not_Manifesto.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;Manifesto can be Poison&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gebhard Greiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:01:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jms request-reponse not responding in Mule</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/12/20/jms-request-reponse-not-responding-in-mule/#comment-391288716</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a workaround. This was fixed in Mule 3.2, that is, now you don't need to add the ReplyToPropertyRequestReplyReplier processor. The flow will automatically return the async reply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claude Mamo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Formatting XML documents with PSPad</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2006/10/06/formatting-xml-document-with-pspad/#comment-388081990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant, thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shlublu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The iPad is a better laptop</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/30/the-ipad-is-a-better-laptop/#comment-380116468</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes, I do think so, ipad is real convenient than laptop. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lindsey Klemash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LAC2011 presentation: Scrum under Architecture</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/27/lac2011-presentation-scrum-under-architecture/#comment-374782215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agile Architecture is a best way to interacting with market .It’s best way to work with small independent customers focused teams, it’s really best way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webmaster1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-374395194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did you really read the article? Nobody is ranting about rapdily changing technology, just wondering what the best choice is...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-374377159</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, I don't think so. This article is nothing but a set of assumptions to rant about the known fact that technology rapidly changes. If you want to stand on solid grounds, why don't you become a physicist? That science changes very rarely and still allows an unlimited number of research options. If you don't like the idea of being a theoretical physicist, why don't you become the experimental? Side note: since I've been studying at University, I've been unwillingly observing the problem-solving ability of most people can be summarized in one word as dubious.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:36:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 million euros wasted, project failed</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/28/25-million-euros-wasted-project-failed/#comment-374197264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very true, aanbestedingen isn't improving the situation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 million euros wasted, project failed</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/28/25-million-euros-wasted-project-failed/#comment-374195683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is another interesting mechanism at work here called "aanbestedingen". In order to prevent overspending the feedback cycle between user and development team becomes even greater. In case of a change all kinds of contractual and rules for fair competition come into play. These make feedback and adaption even harder.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way my experience is that these government bodies use Prince 2 in name. They don't actual do or act as prescribed by Prince 2. Imho sticking to Prince 2 would raise the success rate of their projects.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would value it even more if they would reduce the feedback cycle...&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
