<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Andrej Koelewijn - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-fbad0a49" type="application/json"/><link>http://akoblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://akoblog.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:16:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What is Agile?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/11/what-is-agile/#comment-396864068</link><description>I recommend the definition on page &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Best_practice_Agile.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/B...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gebhard Greiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:16:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What is Agile?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/11/what-is-agile/#comment-396850897</link><description>&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For defining Agile we should focus on &lt;strong&gt;the goal of&lt;br&gt;Agile&lt;/strong&gt; rather than on the misleading, very problematic way&lt;br&gt;suggested by the authors of the Agile Manifesto. Please read &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;a&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;href=&lt;a href="http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/The_New_(2011)_Definition_of_Agile.pdf&gt;The" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/T...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;New (2011) Definitions of Agile or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Agile_is_not_Manifesto.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;Manifesto can be Poison&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For defining Agile we should focus on &lt;strong&gt;the goal of&lt;br&gt;Agile&lt;/strong&gt; rather than on the misleading, very problematic way&lt;br&gt;suggested by the authors of the Agile Manifesto. Please read &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;ul&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;a&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;href=&lt;a href="http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/The_New_(2011)_Definition_of_Agile.pdf&gt;The" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://greiterweb.de/spw/dox/T...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;New (2011) Definitions of Agile or&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/a&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&amp;lt;li&amp;gt;&lt;a href="http://www.greiterweb.de/spw/Agile_is_not_Manifesto.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;The&lt;br&gt;Manifesto can be Poison&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/li&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/ul&amp;gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gebhard Greiter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:01:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jms request-reponse not responding in Mule</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/12/20/jms-request-reponse-not-responding-in-mule/#comment-391288716</link><description>It's a workaround. This was fixed in Mule 3.2, that is, now you don't need to add the ReplyToPropertyRequestReplyReplier processor. The flow will automatically return the async reply.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Claude Mamo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 06:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Formatting XML documents with PSPad</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2006/10/06/formatting-xml-document-with-pspad/#comment-388081990</link><description>Brilliant, thank you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shlublu</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:16:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The iPad is a better laptop</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/30/the-ipad-is-a-better-laptop/#comment-380116468</link><description>yes, I do think so, ipad is real convenient than laptop.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lindsey Klemash</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: LAC2011 presentation: Scrum under Architecture</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/27/lac2011-presentation-scrum-under-architecture/#comment-374782215</link><description>Agile Architecture is a best way to interacting with market .It’s best way to work with small independent customers focused teams, it’s really best way.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webmaster1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 05:30:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-374395194</link><description>Did you really read the article? Nobody is ranting about rapdily changing technology, just wondering what the best choice is...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Software architecture, PHP and Javascript</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/08/22/software-architecture-php-and-javascript/#comment-374377159</link><description>No, I don't think so. This article is nothing but a set of assumptions to rant about the known fact that technology rapidly changes. If you want to stand on solid grounds, why don't you become a physicist? That science changes very rarely and still allows an unlimited number of research options. If you don't like the idea of being a theoretical physicist, why don't you become the experimental? Side note: since I've been studying at University, I've been unwillingly observing the problem-solving ability of most people can be summarized in one word as dubious.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:36:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 million euros wasted, project failed</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/28/25-million-euros-wasted-project-failed/#comment-374197264</link><description>Very true, aanbestedingen isn't improving the situation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:51:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 25 million euros wasted, project failed</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/11/28/25-million-euros-wasted-project-failed/#comment-374195683</link><description>There is another interesting mechanism at work here called "aanbestedingen". In order to prevent overspending the feedback cycle between user and development team becomes even greater. In case of a change all kinds of contractual and rules for fair competition come into play. These make feedback and adaption even harder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the way my experience is that these government bodies use Prince 2 in name. They don't actual do or act as prescribed by Prince 2. Imho sticking to Prince 2 would raise the success rate of their projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would value it even more if they would reduce the feedback cycle...&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 09:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: XSL-1047: (Error) Invalid instantiation&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2005/09/06/xsl-1047-error-invalid-instantiation/#comment-371484505</link><description>From Metalink:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;XML Report Erroring With "oracle.xml.parser.v2.XSLException Invalid instantiation of 'xsl:variable' in 'xsl:for-each-group' context " [ID 562643.1] 	Modified 13-JUL-2011     Type PROBLEM     Status ARCHIVED	 In this Document  Symptoms  Cause  SolutionThis document is being delivered to you via Oracle Support's Rapid Visibility (RaV) process, and therefore has not been subject to an independent technical review.Applies to:Oracle Application Object Library - Version: 11.5.10.2This problem can occur on any platform.SymptomsWhile trying to run a custom concurrent program (with XML output) it is “Completing With Warning” and request log shows:" Beginning post-processing of request XXXX on node &amp;lt;node name=""&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;date&amp;gt;.Post-processing of request XXXX failed at &amp;lt;date&amp;gt; with the error message:One or more post-processing actions failed. Consult the OPP service log for details."The OPP log shows the below error:[UNEXPECTED]  oracle.xml.parser.v2.XSLException: &amp;lt;line 104="" 55,="" column=""&amp;gt;:XSL-1047: (Error) Invalid instantiation of 'xsl:variable' in 'xsl:for-each-group' &lt;a href="http://context.at" rel="nofollow"&gt;context.at&lt;/a&gt; oracle.xml.parser.v2.XSLStylesheet.flushErrors(XSLStylesheet.java:1376)at oracle.xml.parser.v2.XSLStylesheet.execute(XSLStylesheet.java:483)..........CauseThis is an environment setup issue. The issue is caused by the following setup:AF_CLASSPATH in the autoconfig context file does not include the correct files.The setup causesthe issue because all files are needed for XML to process correctly.Solution-- To implement the solution, please execute the following steps::1.Ensure that the AF_CLASSPATH entries in the autoconfig context file have correct references to: dt.jar , tools.jar , charsets.jar , appsborg2.zip etc. Incase these are missing please add them to the AF_CLASSPATH. A sample setting is as follows: AF_CLASSPATH=[JDK_TOP]/lib/dt.jar:[JDK_TOP]/lib/tools.jar:[JDK_TOP]/jre/lib/rt.jar:[JDK13_TOP]/jre/lib/i18n.jar:[JDK_TOP]/jre/lib/charsets.jar:$JAVA_TOP/apsborg2.zip:$ORACLE_HOME/forms60/Java:$JAVA_TOP where [JDK_TOP] is the full path to the JDK installation top directory on Unix. 2. Stop your Apps services. 3. Run autoconfig. 4. Restart the Apps services. 5. Test your custom concurrent programs now.  RelatedProductsOracle E-Business Suite &amp;gt; Applications Technology &amp;gt; Application Object Library &amp;gt; Oracle Application Object LibraryKeywordsAUTOCONFIG; JRE; ORACLE.XML.P&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;/line&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/date&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/date&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/node&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Teobond</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:30:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ADF Training</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2007/02/08/adf-training/#comment-363394656</link><description>where are you offering the training? if it's in Nigeria, kindly reply to: dosunmu.adetokunbo@gmail.com</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dosunmu Adetokunbo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:15:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Presentation: Introduction to Scrum</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/10/26/presentation-introduction-to-scrum/#comment-351848725</link><description>Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:47:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Presentation: Introduction to Scrum</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/10/26/presentation-introduction-to-scrum/#comment-351844679</link><description>Clever presentation, Andrej!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Product Development Example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/30/product-development-example/#comment-331897215</link><description>wdf  u dnt make sense.bare bigning ur self up&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gtaui</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:57:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scrum &amp;#8211; It all starts with the Product Owner</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/29/scrum-it-all-starts-with-the-product-owner/#comment-326947210</link><description>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Andrej. Couldn't agree more that the product owner role is underrated and misunderstood. You can find my view of the role at: &lt;a href="http://www.romanpichler.com/blog/roles/one-page-product-owner/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.romanpichler.com/bl...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roman Pichler</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:32:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-319306562</link><description>Critical mass? Support from big vendors?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wanderson Oliveira</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:47:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using google talk from java example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2008/12/30/using-google-talk-from-java-example/#comment-316589677</link><description>port 80 is working</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AMAAN KHAN</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:57:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using google talk from java example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2008/12/30/using-google-talk-from-java-example/#comment-316579164</link><description>try changing the port 5222 to 80 (or) 443 (or) 5275</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">suneel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:32:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-310965058</link><description>andrej take a look to ItsNat, client-side style of development but in server, pure Java W3C DOM (or other JVM lang) and pure HTML and focused on Single Page Interfaces web sites and applications.&lt;br&gt; The main advantage of this approach is no need of user defined client-server bridges and strong use of Java instead of JavaScript.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.itsnat.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.itsnat.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jmarranz</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 03:15:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Using google talk from java example</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2008/12/30/using-google-talk-from-java-example/#comment-309463771</link><description>XMPPError connecting to &lt;a href="http://talk.google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;talk.google.com&lt;/a&gt;:5222.: remote-server-error(502) XMPPError connecting to &lt;a href="http://talk.google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;talk.google.com&lt;/a&gt;:5222.&lt;br&gt;  -- caused by: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect&lt;br&gt;	at org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPConnection.connectUsingConfiguration(XMPPConnection.java:524)&lt;br&gt;	at org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPConnection.connect(XMPPConnection.java:953)&lt;br&gt;	at MyGTalkClient.main(MyGTalkClient.java:26)&lt;br&gt;Nested Exception: &lt;br&gt;java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketConnect(Native Method)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.doConnect(PlainSocketImpl.java:333)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connectToAddress(PlainSocketImpl.java:195)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.connect(PlainSocketImpl.java:182)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:519)&lt;br&gt;	at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:469)&lt;br&gt;	at org.jivesoftware.smack.proxy.DirectSocketFactory.createSocket(DirectSocketFactory.java:28)&lt;br&gt;	at org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPConnection.connectUsingConfiguration(XMPPConnection.java:512)&lt;br&gt;	at org.jivesoftware.smack.XMPPConnection.connect(XMPPConnection.java:953)&lt;br&gt;	at MyGTalkClient.main(MyGTalkClient.java:26)&lt;br&gt;	at __SHELL8.run(__SHELL8.java:5)&lt;br&gt;	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)&lt;br&gt;	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)&lt;br&gt;	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)&lt;br&gt;	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)&lt;br&gt;	at bluej.runtime.ExecServer$3.run(ExecServer.java:774)&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amaan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 03:58:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-302791068</link><description>Sure, if you have to support browsers without javascript, this is no option.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Server-side validation is a must, as is database validation. Server-side service (REST) or orm frameworks can handle validation without the need for a user interface mvc web framework.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 04:16:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-302788109</link><description>There are still environments, where JavaScript is turned off for very valid reasons. Besides, I wouldn't want to work without server-side validation and for that alone a web framework comes in handy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frisian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 04:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-301699996</link><description>True, single page apps are not very common in the enterprise, but the frameworks and tools you need are there and maturing quickly. What is still missing before we can start building enterprise javascript applications?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrej</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:12:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When will we dump server side web frameworks?</title><link>http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/wp/2011/09/02/when-will-we-dump-server-side-web-frameworks/#comment-301680675</link><description>I don't think single page web applications are very common in the enterprise. I've yet to create a web application that is just one page.  Once you go beyond one page and need to have a controller, data conversion, validation, security, etc frameworks such as JEE or Spring provide a great deal of support.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phillips1021</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 09:15:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
